History of IT

Monday, March 30, 2009

Today we are going to discuss a unique period of India's history called the ITernal age.
This era of Indian history began somewhere around the end of the 20th century and lasted well into the 21st century. It marks a unique technological age that dawned upon this country that, till then, lagged the rest of the world in harnessing technological developments.
Initially, smart Indian engineers began doing petty technical tasks for people in other parts of the world. They found that they could do it at a fraction of a cost of their competitors and still earn big money. Slowly, the word spread and before soon, everyone and their aunt were into IT.
Today, however, we're going to delve more into the social tendencies of this era than the economic aspects.
A lot of research has gone into the area of how people lived and worked. Broadly, historians and sociologists have found the following categories of the ITernal man as per their behavioral tendencies.


The 0-1 year IT professional
These usually consisted of people who'd jumped straight out of college into the shark-infested waters they called IT. When they were not training and learning things they didn't need, they patronized libraries and coffee machines in their 100m radius. Recorded accounts indicate that this tribe used to roam around in large groups - perhaps seeking security in numbers.


The 1-2 year IT professional
This tribe of people often began understanding what they'd got themselves into. With the 2-4 year IT professional (see below), they formed the workhorses of the IT workforce. Cheap labor ensured they were present in large numbers and were the fuel that kept organizations going. Accustomed to working long, odd hours and often around the week, they used to spend a fair bit of time on pondering about what their lives had become (and wrote blogs on it!). They often longed for their carefree days of college. They were often evangelized into the dogma they called "Process" and were made to do things they didn't know and/or didn't care about.


The 2-4 year IT professional
Having spent a fair while, they understood fairly the madness around them and how their world worked. They were also regularly groomed into future roles into management. This involved using esoteric jargon and creating reports and reports of reports. An enterprising few also made a large number of presentations. By the time people progressed into this tribe, they had also been a part of the corporate rehabilitation program they called "onsite". This program involved changing the geographical location and currency of the employee's salary. This was said to have a motivational effect on these men and women for reasons not entirely understood.


The 4+ year IT professional
It is speculated that the behavior of men and women became radically different after this critical juncture. They became everything they'd feared in the past. They were now managers, leaders, designers - in essence, generals marshalling the pawns of the army. Outside this, the distinction becomes rather difficult to determine. Currently, the world’s best historians are trying to understand the identifying traits of people who were more than 4 years into IT. One theory suggests that people moved out after 4 years for good once they realized the importance of things like health, social life et al. This is yet to be verified though. There are other theories that the 4+ group had different diverse sub-groups of its own but little has been discovered so far on that front. Despite these differences, there were some broad similarities in the behavior of men and women of this era - trends that transcended the boundaries of classification. For one, folklore and discussions recorded in these times have a returning and emotional reference to one word - "appraisal". The cult status of this phenomenon is yet to be entirely understood by researchers. What they have found is that this more mention in the art forms of the era - like email forwards, blog posts, etc. periodically in certain parts of the year.
Besides, perfectly modern workplaces were designed in a fashion to accommodate modest stalls serving tea. As some manuscripts indicate, this was called Tapri. This was a place between office and home for these people. It was here that the ITernal man had whatever little of social life that they had. Anything between office politics to life's biggest questions could be discussed here.
Some researchers also believe that this section of the office described a lot about the organization. For example, the number of people here was inversely proportional to the volume of business of the company and was used by business analysts tracking the company to forecast quarterly earnings.


We still don't completely understand what caused the end of the ITernal age – whether it was a sudden "big-bang"-type end or was it slow decline as people moved onto greener pastures.
However, one thing is for sure - no one can claim to have understood the unique land India is without understanding this period of India’s history. This phase will be a subject of interest of all historians seeking to understand India - the way it was, and what it now is.

Read more...

The Light in the Shadow

Thursday, March 26, 2009

What is that impulse that makes us do things at a spin of sec.... All plans all decisions go undone. The impulse is the one that wins in that split of second. 

The state of zero-ness and stillness is the one when you have lost your self... the self 

May be the presence of beloved is bliss in itself, but the beloved has no role . Its the projection of one's own love that is making these moments blissful... Release the self from love .. let the freedom come. Let the love be free and a untrapped self.... a spirit that is just unseparated from the container, untouched like the oil drop that floats around from one part of the vessel to the other part of the vessel... the soul would rise to the ecstasy of unlimited happiness, and the separation with the self would take the soul away... some what farther than one could think of.

Does the smile depend on whether or not the beloved is next to you? The self this moment knows to the best that there is no love present from the side of the beloved. But is that a reason for sorrow or grief. The grief is not associated in this moment of bliss. This is the acceptance of the hurt as if the soul was injured when the body was snatched away. 

What is there to pull, what is there to feel a frown on. Is love about pulling or struggle, or irritation or questioning the beloved? The bliss is to be there present by identifying the reason of the injury to the self. Why do we feel sad on the self, why this pull? Why this wait for acceptance.. why this struggle for hearing that we are loved?

A baby in my house ran to the door listening to the voice of her mother standing at the other end of the entrance door, just then the father deviated his drive for his mother by showing him a mobile which made the baby forget the mother and started following the mobile, something like the self which had to love someone, but the object was not important, and so deviation did not decrease the intensity of the drive for loving. Whether it was the attention getting poured to the mobile instead of the mother. 

Why do we identify ourselves with others. Why cant we be senseless sometimes. Why should only logical beings be praised. Why do we have to run away from our selves in the fear of being stabbed by others at the moment when they know what we are. Are we not mocking with ourselves just to escape the mockery of others. We could not live anyways. Neither completely the way others wanted us to, and no way the way we wanted to. 

The external self matters to us more than ourselves.. Can't I live some moments with myself.... the way I am... the beliefs I have.... We are relative to others. The acceptance or denials matter more that they should in any scenario. This moment I may not make any sense to anyone other than me, but can’t this sensless self of mine be open in the crowd and say that yes, here I am the most illogical self.... the self who does not know what he is saying or writing.... the self image ... all I am is defined by the person in front of me. 

The absolute entity in us does not exist anymore, the self is in search of the its image every second in the pupils of the eyes looking at us, seldom looking into the mirror to ask the self if it identifies us. 

Recently on a evening spent with a dear friend, I got a similar insight. She said ..." why do we look for a person to complete/complement us after marriage.... why cant two complete persons spend the life together... why is the complementation needed... " 

That's the reason why the separation of love hurts.... May be due to this very reason of incompleteness that moment, We have shared the self with someone, so both are the aspects of the same entity now, like two born twins who are attached to each other at birth... any operation done with as much expertise, can not defer the fact that the separation is going to hurt. The separation is going to bleed too.... but that is the fun as per all, that until and unless you have lost the self to someone, what is the worth of love.... 

But, still the mind wonders, why does the self need to loose it's self.... were we made like this only.. an incomplete being which has to search for the completeness in others, in the pupil of the person in front of him.... Is it that we were made incomplete or is it that we don’t make enough effort in discovering the completeness of the self. The completeness that is unmoved... the completeness which is like a river flowing. Flowing in completeness... Branches may meet it, but none of them complete it. Its complete in itself. 

So it will be like a companion... the journey is long, and we are prepared for the voyage by self... any one en-route is a companion, seldom a support.... A companion with whom we may talk , we may smile with but not loose our self to, not share our weight on or share the burden of the self.... so the journey is of a complete soul which is busy walking and heading towards its goal each step.... a side-walker can come along, but should neither himself share the burden nor should be a support to the other, rather just a companion. 

May be it is the way we were made... one dependent on the other.. the body dependent on breath, and we dependent on love.... the breath leaves the body and the body is dead... and the love leaves the self and we are dead..... 

May the body learn to live without the breath... the day will come soon :) 
 

Read more...

Back to TOP